RCA style sound approximation waveshaper

Posted: 4/6/2026 10:37:04 AM
Marko

Joined: 4/5/2026

I got my first theremin seven years ago, my good friend built PAIA Theremax for me. This was more project out of initerest for me and my friend as he was hi-end hi-fi tube electronics builder and I am accordionist. We discussed briefly about tube vs transistor theremin sound, but didn't do any research on this topic as I didn't played theremin very much. Over the last year I have looked a bit more into this subject and discovered some interesting things. First lets look some assumptions about RCA tone:

* RCA specific sound is created by tubes.
* RCA specific sound is associated with RCA theremin oscillators and heterodyne mixer type.
* RCA specific sound is impossible to create with transistor theremin.


These all are correct to some extent but... back then circuit design philosophy was very different and clever tricks were used to reduce component count and overall cost - cost was high back then. Older electronics books describe how to use single transistor in AM radio to amplify, detect RF and also amplify audio signals at same time. I don't have access to RCA theremin for measurement and trial, but I have access to schematic and some waveform pictures. Looking to RCA theremin schematic I noticed very big difference between its design and more modern tube theremin designs - RCA lacks negative grid bias on all stages! If oscillators produce sine waves and mixer puts out sine like wave, then VCA, pre amp and power amp - all without bias voltage - flatten and square off one half of waveform, as can be seen from waveform picture. After discovering that I got an idea! What if I try to just generalize and approximate RCA sound instead of chasing ideal waveform(if it exist at all)? I left mixer stage alone and concentrated only to end result. I looked waveform picture and generalized it to square wave with ~25% duty cycle. Transformers in RCA theremin acted like band pass filters.

Then I did simple listening test with synthesizer with square wave, width set to 25% duty cycle and to my surprise it sounded very similar to RCA theremin. With low-pass filter at output it got softer and smoother at upper range still buzzing at low register. By the way, fast rising and falling edges are what gives buzzing characteristic to sound. This is why Moog style diode based asymmetric clipping waveshaper gives very mellow and smooth sound - it doesn't create fast edges. Now base benchmark was established. Next thing was to implement it somehow to Theremax. Luckily PAIA designers had done much of hard work already. Theremax has very interesting timbre circuit design, it doesn't create nice tone at all, but it is base on what I designed my circuit. Theremax uses voltage comparator IC as Schmitt trigger to create square from sine like soundwave. I implemented same circuit on breadboard, but I added reference voltage adjustment for comparator and pre amp to boost Theremax signal from ~100mV RMS to 6V P-P. Adjusting reference voltage did exactly what I needed - it changed square wave duty cycle! Then I continued with refinements and discovered that comparator IC is very well usable but overdrive voltage must be taken into account - it is problematic at low duty cycles. I just added simple transistor switch to put out square wave at region where comparator is not fully overdriven and gives weird half-sine output. Here is schematic of my design.

Component values can be adjusted as needed. Audio level is expected to be 6V P-P. Ideally this type is circuit is driven from triangle wave with stable amplitude, but Theremin sine like wave does the job with sufficient results. In schematic there is no low-pass filter at output, but on my implementation I added simple one at ~2kHz - without it sound is harsh and bright. Most important thing about this design is its simplicity - no exotic components, no precision tuning. Simplicity may very well make it commercially viable solution for theremins. Other big advantage is flexibility - it can be added as an extension to any theremin and also retaining instruments original sound.

Some technical but interesting scope pictures

Square output at different reference voltages resulting different duty cycles.

Comparator and transistor switch output at overdrive region.

Comparator and transistor switch output at non-overdrive region.

Waveform after low-pass filter


Now most important part - Video and sound examples. I used cheap 12 inch Harley Benton guitar cab as speaker.

Conclusion: If designers at PAIA had discovered this back then, I'm sure that Theremax had been much more popular than Moog Etherwave.

Happy experimenting

Posted: 4/6/2026 12:36:45 PM
JPascal

From: Berlin Germany

Joined: 4/27/2016

Hi Marko, welcome here. Yes, the 25% duty cycle is crucial for the RCA Theremin sound. It ensures that the fourth and eighth harmonics are suppressed, since a rectangular wave has a SINC-shaped magnitude of the frequency signal. We’ve already discussed this here in the forum.

For me, 25% is a reliable starting point for developing good analog theremins. 
The re-creation of the RCA sound I tried sometimes ago, here is a video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smWhz93yGPo 

Posted: 4/6/2026 4:58:05 PM
dewster

From: Northern NJ, USA

Joined: 2/17/2012

Thanks for sharing Marco!

I can't say I'm a huge fan of the buzzy RCA sound, but it's interesting to know its technical origins.  As with open baffle guitar amps, I imagine a fair amount of the final timbre is due to the speaker and its mounting.

For your Theremax, you might try unsoldering the grounding braids on the coax which they used to connect both antennas.  Might help with the drift.  No idea what they thought they were shielding in or out?  All it can do is introduce a ton of mechanical capacitive padding.

Fatter antennas would likely help too, those skinny wires don't provide a lot of capacitive interaction.

I think the grounded plate on the bottom of the enclosure is probably a mistake too.

Posted: 4/6/2026 5:23:51 PM
Marko

Joined: 4/5/2026

I think that pulse widths between 5% to 50% are interesting. I agree that 25% gives nice old school sound. Currently I can't get below 10% with real theremin - below 5% is possible with function generator. I probably need to design proper pre amp and tap sound off directly from mixer. There is HPF after mixer, probably should decrease its capacitor value to flatten amplitude response at higher frequencies. My current pre amp is made from suspicious scrap parts and fake aliexpress opapms.

Good thing about waveshapers is that they can be switched. I have Moog style asymmetric diode clipper on other protoboard. In future I may combine both into one module that can be switched on fly.

I can't comment on cable shielding, I haven't tried to disconnect braids. If I remove metal plate from bottom of the enclosure, then I don't have enclosure anymore.

My playing is rough because I switch theremin on only couple times in year. I have recorded some music with it, but I don't practice it.

Some videos where I use Theremax stock tone.

Posted: 4/6/2026 6:40:45 PM
JPascal

From: Berlin Germany

Joined: 4/27/2016

Oh, you're a multi-instrumentalist. That's cool. Just like 8-track recording back in the day...

Posted: 4/6/2026 6:46:25 PM
dewster

From: Northern NJ, USA

Joined: 2/17/2012

"I can't comment on cable shielding, I haven't tried to disconnect braids."  - Marko

Well I can comment on it - it makes no freaking sense!   First time I saw it I was like "waaa?"  Lately I've been interacting with someone who inherited a Theremax and he reported that desoldering the braids largely fixed the drift.

"If I remove metal plate from bottom of the enclosure, then I don't have enclosure anymore."

Yah, you'd have replace it with wood or something non-conductive.  When I see this kind of stuff on a Theremin I have to wonder about the basic engineering of everything else in there.

Also, if I were operating on this, I'd replace the Zener with a 3 terminal regulator - voltage regulation is job #1 when it comes to oscillator stability.  PAiA was rather notorious for cutting every possible corner in their circuitry, but that was back when actives were relatively more expensive - there's really no excuse for it now.

You must be logged in to post a reply. Please log in or register for a new account.