[i]"@Fred: You are a genius on the theoretical field. But sometimes, a more pragmatic view paired with some practical experience, may be more helpful." - Thierry[/i]
LOL ;-) - Thank you for the compliment, Thierry!
I wholeheartedly agree with your "a more pragmatic view.." The object of the game "should" be for me to get my bloody theremin on the market, and start earning some money - rather than stretching the process out in my search for perfection..
But as for "practical experience" I am certainly not lacking.. Oh, there was a time about 3 years ago when my ideas did lack practical theremin expierience, and I ignorantly spouted quite a lot of BS.. But I have now spent a full 3 years actually inventing/designing/building/testing/evaluating almost every possible theremin circuit and configuration.
I have not gained much of my expierience the way you have - I have worked on / modified / repaired reletively few "standard" theremins like the EW - And therefore, unlike you, the finer points of particular theremins (the recent modification to the EW tuning circuit, for example) are not known to me.. So you are, without doubt, the most knowledgable person to consult regarding these issues.. I go by the EW "Hotrodding" schematic when discussing the EW - You have more up-to-date knowledge.
Fred.
(P.S. - It would be really usefull to the theremin community if up-to-date EW schematics were available.. Do you know where these can be obtained, or could you perhaps post a schematic to TW, so that everyone can benefit ?)
[b] Added ->[/b]
It seems from what you say in this, and prior posting (http://www.thereminworld.com/forum.asp?cmd=p&T=4741&F=557), that Moog have modified the EW tuning circuit - and that this modification is prone to failure.
If this is true, then a theoretical evaluation of the failure mechanism needs to be done, and changes need to be made to eliminate this failure mechanism.
To me, there seems little point in replacing components which have failed, if the causitive mechanism for the failure of the previous components is not rectified first - one is just asking for the same fault to re-appear at some later date if one simply replaces these components without first fixing the cause of the problem.
If Q9 is operating as a voltage follower, and blows up, there are only a few possible causes [i](without seeing the actual circuit, this is a guess)[/i] - Either Ic (current through the collector -> emitter) is excessive, or the dissipation is excessive, or there is some mechanism wherebye base->emitter current/voltage is exceeded.. most likely is probably that Ic (Ie) is being exceeded if it is dumping excessive current into a discharged capacitor (this mode of failure would likely occur as the theremin is turned on, and not after that - a bit like how the surge current into a fillament bulb usually causes the fillament to blow when it is first turned on), and there is inadequate current limiting (emitter series resistor) protecting against this scenario.. but any of the above mechanisms could be to blame - and all should be easy to rectify - probably with no more than adding a single resistor.
It is, IMHO, extremely unlikely that leakage current through a modern capacitor could be great enough to exceed the 200mA current rating of a 2n3906 - even if this capacitor does not have a decent voltage over-rating..